home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java
- Path: uu4news.netcom.com!friend!news
- From: rich@kastle.com (Richard Krehbiel)
- Subject: Re: Java closer to Modula-3 than to C++
- Message-ID: <1996Mar1.143408.951@friend.kastle.com>
- Sender: news@friend.kastle.com (News)
- Reply-To: rich@kastle.com
- Organization: Kastle Development Associates
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
- References: <31308FE2.167E@sophia.inria.fr> <1996Feb26.192508.2614@friend.kastle.com> <DAGENAIS.96Feb29113254@hagen.vlsi.polymtl.ca>
- Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 14:35:20 GMT
-
- dagenais@hagen.vlsi.polymtl.ca (Michel Dagenais) wrote:
-
- >In article <1996Feb26.192508.2614@friend.kastle.com> rich@kastle.com (Richard Krehbiel) writes:
-
- > Oh, I think it's clear that C++ gets it's success from C. C #includes
- > and libraries can (almost always) be called upon in C++ programs.
- > Nothing like that can be said of Modula-3 or Java.
-
- >Well, too bad i did not know i could not do it. I have called X libraries,
- >unix system calls, the gnu dbm library, ODBC drivers... from Modula-3 without
- >problem.
-
- Well, then you've managed the easy half of the battle. Now get
- Modula-3 to include C header files and make proper sense of them.
-
- --
- Richard Krehbiel, Kastle Systems, Arlington VA USA
- rich@kastle.com (work) or richk@mnsinc.com (personal)
-
-